Business Club December 14th According to "Beijing Daily" reported on December 9, the world is more common in the use of antibiotics in the aquaculture industry, China is one of the countries where aquaculture abuse of antibiotics is more serious. A series of news also triggered widespread concern and hot discussion from all walks of life.
Last week, a survey conducted by the China Youth Daily Social Survey Center (2,528 people involved) showed that 78.9% of people said they had been concerned about news about aquaculture abuse of antibiotics, of which 30.2% were “very concernedâ€.
Among the interviewees, "post-80s" accounted for 49.2%, and "post-70s" accounted for 34.4%.
What causes the abuse of antibiotics in the livestock industry?
In recent reports, some experts worry that if the aquaculture industry continues to abuse antibiotics, people will eat “time bombs†for long-term consumption.
The survey revealed that when asked “whether you have such concernsâ€, over 90% (96.7%) expressed “worryâ€, of which 58.3% said they were “very worriedâ€.
"We are all about biochemical fighters, what haven't eaten?" Some netizens said they don't care. "Modern medicine is so developed that even if such meat products are harmful to the human body, then there will be new drugs to solve this problem."
In fact, some medical professionals are not optimistic about this. Some experts said that the abuse of antibiotics will technically cause the growth of bacterial resistance, resulting in the failure of antibiotics for bacteria in a short period of time. In the 40s of last century, as the earliest antibacterial drug, penicillin successfully solved many clinical problems. However, in less than 20 years, it has lost its effect in the treatment of some infectious diseases in most parts of the world.
A person from the Ministry of Health has stated that at present, each country develops one antibiotic for 10 years, while bacterial production only takes two years. "If we do not control it, we will not be able to use the effective antibiotics for a long time.
Xiao Yonghong, a professor at the First Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical School, once discovered that many people have developed resistance to certain drugs and made doctors more difficult to treat.
"Antibiotics must be used in a standardized manner." Xiao Yonghong said that the long-term use of antibiotics in animals will inevitably produce residues in the body. In January 2006, the European Union had completely banned the use of auxin in feed or the use of antibiotics as feed growth additives.
Xiao Yonghong conducted a survey in 2007 and found that China produces approximately 210,000 tons of antibiotic raw materials each year, including 97,000 tons of antibiotics used in animal husbandry, accounting for 46.1% of the total annual output.
What caused the abuse of antibiotics in the breeding industry? In the survey, 80.7% of the people attributed the reason to “poor regulatory oversightâ€; 75.9% believed that this was caused by the farmers’ interest; 73.2% thought the reason was “the feed industry was driven by profitâ€; 57.4% of people pointed to the "imperfect use of antibiotics in mammals."
In fact, China has a complete system for the supervision of antibiotics. Many experts interviewed by the newspaper said that the relevant provisions for the use of antibiotics in our country are complete and strict, but there are indeed "incomplete places" in the implementation.
A professor of the College of Biotechnology at a certain agricultural university, who declined to be named, told this reporter that there is an existing phenomenon of abuse of antibiotics in the aquaculture industry, especially among some free-living households, and it is difficult for us to control it. Some retailers often find veterinarians and veterinary drug stations to buy antibiotics after discovering that the animals are ill. These include drugs that are banned by some countries, or those that are expired.
Nowadays, the state has strict regulations on the "drug withdrawal period" before the listing of animals, that is, drugs must be discontinued prior to listing so that antibiotics can be metabolized in animals. However, this expert revealed that in the actual process, this article has not been implemented very well. "Our quality inspection of agricultural products is better than the detection of safety. In addition, we have stricter control over export agricultural products, have quality tracking control, and will re-inspect at the time of export, and an unqualified overall return, but this can only be applied to large-scale production. In breeding, it is difficult for some retail households to carry out follow-up and whole-course testing. Moreover, there is no absolute requirement for the use of antibiotics in animals."
The foreign company employee Xiangping said: "I believe that as long as the state strengthens inspection and attention, once it is detected and punished severely, I will not believe that there are others who dare to do this." However, Xiang Ping believes that if the situation is "No report, no punishment will be found." It's difficult to improve the overall situation.
Xiangping also feels that the existing news reports and information "not quench their thirst": "Some related reports are vague, general, and mostly scientific descriptions. I really want to know the actual situation of the use of antibiotics in the breeding industry. I hope experts can tell consumers. How to distinguish meat products that have used antibiotics and what specific effects they will have on the body.â€
78.8% of people proposed to formulate drug residue standards for animal foods
When asked to buy meat products, Xiang Ping often asked hawkers: “You didn’t feed this meat?†However, in the casual response of hawkers and “Nothing, nothing†she still put the meat products into the dish. basket.
It is understood that the country that prohibits the use of antibiotic feed (additives) by animals is the best country, and it is Denmark, the world's largest pork exporter. Since 1995, Denmark has kept animals away from antibiotics.
According to reports, in 1995, a Danish television station broadcasted a program called "a drug pig" and it was revealed that "how the pigs were soaked in antibiotics canisters" grew up. At the time, this TV program "shocked Denmark."
The Danish television station also conducted a test: the label “The meat comes from animals fed antibiotics†was placed on the meat products in the supermarket, and a hidden camera was placed next to it. The results show that none of the customers are willing to buy these products.
In this survey, when asked, "If a supermarket sells meat products labeled "The meat comes from animals fed with antibiotics", will you buy "? When 61.6% of people choose "Never", 29.4 % of people said "may not be", and 8.6% of people choose "can not say."
"If it can be determined that a certain meat product contains antibiotics, I certainly do not buy it." Xiang Ping said that as long as you can buy meat products that do not contain antibiotics, even if you will insist on buying, "I can't eat meat twice a week before, now Eat once a week."
Xiang Ping suggested that each meat product should have a detailed, traceable antibiotic usage mark or certification. In this survey, 90.6% of respondents expressed "expectations" for this proposal, 54.1% of whom said they "are very much looking forward to."
In addition, 79.4% of the people suggested that the antibiotic abuse of the breeding industry should be strictly controlled, and penalties should be imposed on infringing farmers. 78.8% of the people recommended the establishment of a drug residue standard for animal foods; 72.9 Percent of people expect legislation to provide standards for the use of antibiotics in meat products; 69.5% of people recommend that aquaculture management departments should establish more rigorous review and supervision mechanisms; 48.5% of people hope that relevant departments will spread antibiotic knowledge to the public.
Last week, a survey conducted by the China Youth Daily Social Survey Center (2,528 people involved) showed that 78.9% of people said they had been concerned about news about aquaculture abuse of antibiotics, of which 30.2% were “very concernedâ€.
Among the interviewees, "post-80s" accounted for 49.2%, and "post-70s" accounted for 34.4%.
What causes the abuse of antibiotics in the livestock industry?
In recent reports, some experts worry that if the aquaculture industry continues to abuse antibiotics, people will eat “time bombs†for long-term consumption.
The survey revealed that when asked “whether you have such concernsâ€, over 90% (96.7%) expressed “worryâ€, of which 58.3% said they were “very worriedâ€.
"We are all about biochemical fighters, what haven't eaten?" Some netizens said they don't care. "Modern medicine is so developed that even if such meat products are harmful to the human body, then there will be new drugs to solve this problem."
In fact, some medical professionals are not optimistic about this. Some experts said that the abuse of antibiotics will technically cause the growth of bacterial resistance, resulting in the failure of antibiotics for bacteria in a short period of time. In the 40s of last century, as the earliest antibacterial drug, penicillin successfully solved many clinical problems. However, in less than 20 years, it has lost its effect in the treatment of some infectious diseases in most parts of the world.
A person from the Ministry of Health has stated that at present, each country develops one antibiotic for 10 years, while bacterial production only takes two years. "If we do not control it, we will not be able to use the effective antibiotics for a long time.
Xiao Yonghong, a professor at the First Hospital of Zhejiang University Medical School, once discovered that many people have developed resistance to certain drugs and made doctors more difficult to treat.
"Antibiotics must be used in a standardized manner." Xiao Yonghong said that the long-term use of antibiotics in animals will inevitably produce residues in the body. In January 2006, the European Union had completely banned the use of auxin in feed or the use of antibiotics as feed growth additives.
Xiao Yonghong conducted a survey in 2007 and found that China produces approximately 210,000 tons of antibiotic raw materials each year, including 97,000 tons of antibiotics used in animal husbandry, accounting for 46.1% of the total annual output.
What caused the abuse of antibiotics in the breeding industry? In the survey, 80.7% of the people attributed the reason to “poor regulatory oversightâ€; 75.9% believed that this was caused by the farmers’ interest; 73.2% thought the reason was “the feed industry was driven by profitâ€; 57.4% of people pointed to the "imperfect use of antibiotics in mammals."
In fact, China has a complete system for the supervision of antibiotics. Many experts interviewed by the newspaper said that the relevant provisions for the use of antibiotics in our country are complete and strict, but there are indeed "incomplete places" in the implementation.
A professor of the College of Biotechnology at a certain agricultural university, who declined to be named, told this reporter that there is an existing phenomenon of abuse of antibiotics in the aquaculture industry, especially among some free-living households, and it is difficult for us to control it. Some retailers often find veterinarians and veterinary drug stations to buy antibiotics after discovering that the animals are ill. These include drugs that are banned by some countries, or those that are expired.
Nowadays, the state has strict regulations on the "drug withdrawal period" before the listing of animals, that is, drugs must be discontinued prior to listing so that antibiotics can be metabolized in animals. However, this expert revealed that in the actual process, this article has not been implemented very well. "Our quality inspection of agricultural products is better than the detection of safety. In addition, we have stricter control over export agricultural products, have quality tracking control, and will re-inspect at the time of export, and an unqualified overall return, but this can only be applied to large-scale production. In breeding, it is difficult for some retail households to carry out follow-up and whole-course testing. Moreover, there is no absolute requirement for the use of antibiotics in animals."
The foreign company employee Xiangping said: "I believe that as long as the state strengthens inspection and attention, once it is detected and punished severely, I will not believe that there are others who dare to do this." However, Xiang Ping believes that if the situation is "No report, no punishment will be found." It's difficult to improve the overall situation.
Xiangping also feels that the existing news reports and information "not quench their thirst": "Some related reports are vague, general, and mostly scientific descriptions. I really want to know the actual situation of the use of antibiotics in the breeding industry. I hope experts can tell consumers. How to distinguish meat products that have used antibiotics and what specific effects they will have on the body.â€
78.8% of people proposed to formulate drug residue standards for animal foods
When asked to buy meat products, Xiang Ping often asked hawkers: “You didn’t feed this meat?†However, in the casual response of hawkers and “Nothing, nothing†she still put the meat products into the dish. basket.
It is understood that the country that prohibits the use of antibiotic feed (additives) by animals is the best country, and it is Denmark, the world's largest pork exporter. Since 1995, Denmark has kept animals away from antibiotics.
According to reports, in 1995, a Danish television station broadcasted a program called "a drug pig" and it was revealed that "how the pigs were soaked in antibiotics canisters" grew up. At the time, this TV program "shocked Denmark."
The Danish television station also conducted a test: the label “The meat comes from animals fed antibiotics†was placed on the meat products in the supermarket, and a hidden camera was placed next to it. The results show that none of the customers are willing to buy these products.
In this survey, when asked, "If a supermarket sells meat products labeled "The meat comes from animals fed with antibiotics", will you buy "? When 61.6% of people choose "Never", 29.4 % of people said "may not be", and 8.6% of people choose "can not say."
"If it can be determined that a certain meat product contains antibiotics, I certainly do not buy it." Xiang Ping said that as long as you can buy meat products that do not contain antibiotics, even if you will insist on buying, "I can't eat meat twice a week before, now Eat once a week."
Xiang Ping suggested that each meat product should have a detailed, traceable antibiotic usage mark or certification. In this survey, 90.6% of respondents expressed "expectations" for this proposal, 54.1% of whom said they "are very much looking forward to."
In addition, 79.4% of the people suggested that the antibiotic abuse of the breeding industry should be strictly controlled, and penalties should be imposed on infringing farmers. 78.8% of the people recommended the establishment of a drug residue standard for animal foods; 72.9 Percent of people expect legislation to provide standards for the use of antibiotics in meat products; 69.5% of people recommend that aquaculture management departments should establish more rigorous review and supervision mechanisms; 48.5% of people hope that relevant departments will spread antibiotic knowledge to the public.
Large Starch Separator Mahcine
Large Starch Separator Machine,Separator For Corn Starch,Edible Starch Separator Machine,Cassava Starch Processing
Shuangfeng County Dingyuan Machinery Manufacturing Co. Ltd.. , https://www.separators.pl